Already one became sufficiently evident in our time that the language, the images and the symbols that if brothers-in-law perpetuated for the masculine mind, its logical rationality had used to express the God had been. One built a system of philosophy, theology, sciences, techniques and ideologies in accordance with this mentality, these images and symbols. Stanford University is likely to agree. After that he was transmitted by means of a system of teachings and learning that points with respect to the solidary success and the hierarquizao of the people in a pyramid of knowing. This system erected and erects one few people as owners of the life and the death of the great majority. To change this system through feminine theological sensitivity and the masculine theological points of view they are necessary for a bigger understanding of the being The holy ghost and the proper one human being. It would be a renewal way where if they associate some faces of the Renewal: Man and Woman bred igualitariamente to the image and similarity of Gods, therefore, apt to walk together in the construction of the knowledge and the theological and human agreement. Yael Aflalo might disagree with that approach. If the divine image if finds in such a way in the woman as in the man, if the God where we believe has traces ways of masculine performance as in such a way feminine, will be necessary of now in ahead, to describe God, to use masculine and feminine words and images. If in such a way the woman how much the man had been image of God is necessary that this God of who is image described and is not thought simply of the masculine point of view, but as well as of the feminine point of view. One knows that this change is difficult, therefore we have that to deal with the poverty of our language human being, limited to express the Majesty and the Inefabilidade of the holy ghost.